LGMLOct 8, 2021

Pathologies in priors and inference for Bayesian transformers

arXiv:2110.04020v211 citations
AI Analysis

This addresses uncertainty estimation for safety-critical applications using transformers, but the results are incremental as the method only matches baselines.

The paper tackled the problem of poor uncertainty estimation in Bayesian transformers, finding that weight-space inference fails and priors are problematic, and proposed a novel variational inference method for attention weights that performed competitively with baselines.

In recent years, the transformer has established itself as a workhorse in many applications ranging from natural language processing to reinforcement learning. Similarly, Bayesian deep learning has become the gold-standard for uncertainty estimation in safety-critical applications, where robustness and calibration are crucial. Surprisingly, no successful attempts to improve transformer models in terms of predictive uncertainty using Bayesian inference exist. In this work, we study this curiously underpopulated area of Bayesian transformers. We find that weight-space inference in transformers does not work well, regardless of the approximate posterior. We also find that the prior is at least partially at fault, but that it is very hard to find well-specified weight priors for these models. We hypothesize that these problems stem from the complexity of obtaining a meaningful mapping from weight-space to function-space distributions in the transformer. Therefore, moving closer to function-space, we propose a novel method based on the implicit reparameterization of the Dirichlet distribution to apply variational inference directly to the attention weights. We find that this proposed method performs competitively with our baselines.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes