Quantifying disparities in intimate partner violence: a machine learning method to correct for underreporting
This work addresses a critical issue in public health by enabling more equitable policy-making for groups disproportionately affected by underreported conditions, though it is incremental as it builds upon existing frameworks.
The paper tackles the problem of estimating relative prevalence of underreported medical conditions, such as intimate partner violence, by developing a machine learning method based on positive unlabeled learning, which recovers relative prevalence more accurately than baselines in synthetic and real health data experiments.
Estimating the prevalence of a medical condition, or the proportion of the population in which it occurs, is a fundamental problem in healthcare and public health. Accurate estimates of the relative prevalence across groups -- capturing, for example, that a condition affects women more frequently than men -- facilitate effective and equitable health policy which prioritizes groups who are disproportionately affected by a condition. However, it is difficult to estimate relative prevalence when a medical condition is underreported. In this work, we provide a method for accurately estimating the relative prevalence of underreported medical conditions, building upon the positive unlabeled learning framework. We show that under the commonly made covariate shift assumption -- i.e., that the probability of having a disease conditional on symptoms remains constant across groups -- we can recover the relative prevalence, even without restrictive assumptions commonly made in positive unlabeled learning and even if it is impossible to recover the absolute prevalence. We conduct experiments on synthetic and real health data which demonstrate our method's ability to recover the relative prevalence more accurately than do baselines, and demonstrate the method's robustness to plausible violations of the covariate shift assumption. We conclude by illustrating the applicability of our method to case studies of intimate partner violence and hate speech.