From Fragmentation to Liberation
This work addresses Internet governance for policymakers and researchers, offering a new analytical perspective.
The paper argues that 'Internet fragmentation' should be reinterpreted as 'Internet conflict' to better analyze governance issues, concluding that frameworks must serve to identify interventions for liberatory outcomes.
In this paper, I argue that "Internet fragmentation" as a phenomenon is only meaningful in the context of the US's hegemonic control over the Internet. I propose a broader and, I argue, more richly predictive frame: Internet conflict. I show how this frame provides fresh analytical purchase to some of the questions I list above, using it to contextualize several apparently distinct phenomena. I conclude by arguing that only one question gives this analytical frame, or any other, a higher purpose: what particular interventions to Internet governance can produce meaningfully liberatory outcomes? Any descriptive framework is only useful insofar as it can be mobilized to answer this normative question.