An algorithm for a fairer and better voting system
This work tackles the fairness and effectiveness of voting systems, which have social impacts in politics and applications in AI ensemble methods, though it appears incremental as it builds on existing voting algorithms.
The authors introduced a novel ranked voting system to address the problem of selecting the best candidate in elections, demonstrating through simulations that it outperforms existing methods like Instant-Runoff Voting and First Past The Post under certain conditions.
The major finding, of this article, is an ensemble method, but more exactly, a novel, better ranked voting system (and other variations of it), that aims to solve the problem of finding the best candidate to represent the voters. We have the source code on GitHub, for making realistic simulations of elections, based on artificial intelligence for comparing different variations of the algorithm, and other already known algorithms. We have convincing evidence that our algorithm is better than Instant-Runoff Voting, Preferential Block Voting, Single Transferable Vote, and First Past The Post (if certain, natural conditions are met, to support the wisdom of the crowds). By also comparing with the best voter, we demonstrated the wisdom of the crowds, suggesting that democracy (distributed system) is a better option than dictatorship (centralized system), if those certain, natural conditions are met. Voting systems are not restricted to politics, they are ensemble methods for artificial intelligence, but the context of this article is natural intelligence. It is important to find a system that is fair (e.g. freedom of expression on the ballot exists), especially when the outcome of the voting system has social impact: some voting systems have the unfair inevitability to trend (over time) towards the same two major candidates (Duverger's law).