GTLGMAOCPROct 28, 2021

Fair Incentives for Repeated Engagement

arXiv:2111.00002v31 citations
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This addresses fairness in repeated engagement systems for decision-makers, offering a novel approach to prevent unintentional discrimination, though it is incremental in combining fairness constraints with existing incentive models.

The paper tackles the problem of designing optimal monetary incentive schemes for agent retention under fairness constraints, showing that dynamic policies can unintentionally discriminate between agent types and presenting an asymptotically optimal policy to avoid such outcomes.

We study a decision-maker's problem of finding optimal monetary incentive schemes for retention when faced with agents whose participation decisions (stochastically) depend on the incentive they receive. Our focus is on policies constrained to fulfill two fairness properties that preclude outcomes wherein different groups of agents experience different treatment on average. We formulate the problem as a high-dimensional stochastic optimization problem, and study it through the use of a closely related deterministic variant. We show that the optimal static solution to this deterministic variant is asymptotically optimal for the dynamic problem under fairness constraints. Though solving for the optimal static solution gives rise to a non-convex optimization problem, we uncover a structural property that allows us to design a tractable, fast-converging heuristic policy. Traditional schemes for retention ignore fairness constraints; indeed, the goal in these is to use differentiation to incentivize repeated engagement with the system. Our work (i) shows that even in the absence of explicit discrimination, dynamic policies may unintentionally discriminate between agents of different types by varying the type composition of the system, and (ii) presents an asymptotically optimal policy to avoid such discriminatory outcomes.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes