MLLGPRDec 11, 2021

Test Set Sizing Via Random Matrix Theory

arXiv:2112.05977v411 citations
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This provides a foundational step towards automatic training-test set sizing in machine learning, though it is incremental as it applies only to a specific linear regression case.

The paper tackles the problem of determining the optimal training-testing data split for simple linear regression with Gaussian data, deriving that the training set size is the root of a quartic polynomial depending only on the number of data points and dimensions, with results supported by computational evidence.

This paper uses techniques from Random Matrix Theory to find the ideal training-testing data split for a simple linear regression with m data points, each an independent n-dimensional multivariate Gaussian. It defines "ideal" as satisfying the integrity metric, i.e. the empirical model error is the actual measurement noise, and thus fairly reflects the value or lack of same of the model. This paper is the first to solve for the training and test size for any model in a way that is truly optimal. The number of data points in the training set is the root of a quartic polynomial Theorem 1 derives which depends only on m and n; the covariance matrix of the multivariate Gaussian, the true model parameters, and the true measurement noise drop out of the calculations. The critical mathematical difficulties were realizing that the problems herein were discussed in the context of the Jacobi Ensemble, a probability distribution describing the eigenvalues of a known random matrix model, and evaluating a new integral in the style of Selberg and Aomoto. Mathematical results are supported with thorough computational evidence. This paper is a step towards automatic choices of training/test set sizes in machine learning.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes