Problem-dependent attention and effort in neural networks with applications to image resolution and model selection
This work addresses efficiency challenges in image classification for practitioners by offering methods to lower resource usage, though it is incremental as it builds on ensemble techniques without requiring new training.
This paper tackles the problem of reducing data and computation costs in image classification by introducing two ensemble-based methods that avoid additional training. The results show significant reductions: data usage decreased by up to 84.6% and computation cost by up to 89.2% on various datasets with less than a 5% accuracy drop, while also improving accuracy when cost is not a constraint.
This paper introduces two new ensemble-based methods to reduce the data and computation costs of image classification. They can be used with any set of classifiers and do not require additional training. In the first approach, data usage is reduced by only analyzing a full-sized image if the model has low confidence in classifying a low-resolution pixelated version. When applied on the best performing classifiers considered here, data usage is reduced by 61.2% on MNIST, 69.6% on KMNIST, 56.3% on FashionMNIST, 84.6% on SVHN, 40.6% on ImageNet, and 27.6% on ImageNet-V2, all with a less than 5% reduction in accuracy. However, for CIFAR-10, the pixelated data are not particularly informative, and the ensemble approach increases data usage while reducing accuracy. In the second approach, compute costs are reduced by only using a complex model if a simpler model has low confidence in its classification. Computation cost is reduced by 82.1% on MNIST, 47.6% on KMNIST, 72.3% on FashionMNIST, 86.9% on SVHN, 89.2% on ImageNet, and 81.5% on ImageNet-V2, all with a less than 5% reduction in accuracy; for CIFAR-10 the corresponding improvements are smaller at 13.5%. When cost is not an object, choosing the projection from the most confident model for each observation increases validation accuracy to 81.0% from 79.3% for ImageNet and to 69.4% from 67.5% for ImageNet-V2.