LGNEOCJan 28, 2022

A Simple Guard for Learned Optimizers

arXiv:2201.12426v312 citations
AI Analysis

This addresses the reliability and generalization issues of learned optimizers for machine learning practitioners, though it is incremental as it builds on existing safeguarded L2O approaches.

The paper tackles the problem of learned optimizers (L2Os) lacking convergence guarantees and poor out-of-distribution generalization by proposing Loss-Guarded L2O (LGL2O), a simpler and cheaper safeguarded method that conditionally switches between a learned optimizer and a generic one based on expected future loss, achieving better convergence than prior safeguarded methods in empirical results.

If the trend of learned components eventually outperforming their hand-crafted version continues, learned optimizers will eventually outperform hand-crafted optimizers like SGD or Adam. Even if learned optimizers (L2Os) eventually outpace hand-crafted ones in practice however, they are still not provably convergent and might fail out of distribution. These are the questions addressed here. Currently, learned optimizers frequently outperform generic hand-crafted optimizers (such as gradient descent) at the beginning of learning but they generally plateau after some time while the generic algorithms continue to make progress and often overtake the learned algorithm as Aesop's tortoise which overtakes the hare. L2Os also still have a difficult time generalizing out of distribution. Heaton et al. proposed Safeguarded L2O (GL2O) which can take a learned optimizer and safeguard it with a generic learning algorithm so that by conditionally switching between the two, the resulting algorithm is provably convergent. We propose a new class of Safeguarded L2O, called Loss-Guarded L2O (LGL2O), which is both conceptually simpler and computationally less expensive. The guarding mechanism decides solely based on the expected future loss value of both optimizers. Furthermore, we show theoretical proof of LGL2O's convergence guarantee and empirical results comparing to GL2O and other baselines showing that it combines the best of both L2O and SGD and that in practice converges much better than GL2O.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes