Using Social Media Images for Building Function Classification
This work addresses urban planning and geo-information applications by providing a method to classify building functions, but it is incremental as it builds on existing social media data and state-of-the-art architectures.
The study tackled the problem of predicting building functions from ground-level imagery by developing a filtering pipeline to extract high-quality images from social media datasets, achieving an F1-score of up to 0.51 in a 3-class classification task, though performance was limited by weak labels from OpenStreetMap.
Urban land use on a building instance level is crucial geo-information for many applications, yet difficult to obtain. An intuitive approach to close this gap is predicting building functions from ground level imagery. Social media image platforms contain billions of images, with a large variety of motifs including but not limited to street perspectives. To cope with this issue this study proposes a filtering pipeline to yield high quality, ground level imagery from large social media image datasets. The pipeline ensures that all resulting images have full and valid geotags with a compass direction to relate image content and spatial objects from maps. We analyze our method on a culturally diverse social media dataset from Flickr with more than 28 million images from 42 cities around the world. The obtained dataset is then evaluated in a context of 3-classes building function classification task. The three building classes that are considered in this study are: commercial, residential, and other. Fine-tuned state-of-the-art architectures yield F1-scores of up to 0.51 on the filtered images. Our analysis shows that the performance is highly limited by the quality of the labels obtained from OpenStreetMap, as the metrics increase by 0.2 if only human validated labels are considered. Therefore, we consider these labels to be weak and publish the resulting images from our pipeline together with the buildings they are showing as a weakly labeled dataset.