CycleGAN for Undamaged-to-Damaged Domain Translation for Structural Health Monitoring and Damage Detection
This enables proactive structural health monitoring and damage detection for civil engineering, though it is incremental as it adapts existing GAN methods to a specific domain.
The study tackled the problem of predicting structural damage by developing a CycleGAN variant to translate undamaged-to-damaged dynamic signatures, demonstrating accurate generation of damaged responses from undamaged ones.
The recent advances in the data science field in the last few decades have benefitted many other fields including Structural Health Monitoring (SHM). Particularly, Artificial Intelligence (AI) such as Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) methods for vibration-based damage diagnostics of civil structures has been utilized extensively due to the observed high performances in learning from data. Along with diagnostics, damage prognostics is also vitally important for estimating the remaining useful life of civil structures. Currently, AI-based data-driven methods used for damage diagnostics and prognostics centered on historical data of the structures and require a substantial amount of data for prediction models. Although some of these methods are generative-based models, they are used to perform ML or DL tasks such as classification, regression, clustering, etc. after learning the distribution of the data. In this study, a variant of Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN), Cycle-Consistent Wasserstein Deep Convolutional GAN with Gradient Penalty (CycleWDCGAN-GP) model is developed to investigate the "transition of structural dynamic signature from an undamaged-to-damaged state" and "if this transition can be employed for predictive damage detection". The outcomes of this study demonstrate that the proposed model can accurately generate damaged responses from undamaged responses or vice versa. In other words, it will be possible to understand the damaged condition while the structure is still in a healthy (undamaged) condition or vice versa with the proposed methodology. This will enable a more proactive approach in overseeing the life-cycle performance as well as in predicting the remaining useful life of structures.