Classical versus Quantum: comparing Tensor Network-based Quantum Circuits on LHC data
This work addresses the efficiency of quantum versus classical methods for machine learning on complex particle physics data, showing incremental improvements in understanding hybrid architectures.
The study compared classical tensor networks (TNs) and TN-inspired quantum circuits on simulated LHC data, finding that classical TNs need exponentially large bond dimensions and more training samples to match quantum performance, while also facing challenges like flat loss landscapes.
Tensor Networks (TN) are approximations of high-dimensional tensors designed to represent locally entangled quantum many-body systems efficiently. This study provides a comprehensive comparison between classical TNs and TN-inspired quantum circuits in the context of Machine Learning on highly complex, simulated LHC data. We show that classical TNs require exponentially large bond dimensions and higher Hilbert-space mapping to perform comparably to their quantum counterparts. While such an expansion in the dimensionality allows better performance, we observe that, with increased dimensionality, classical TNs lead to a highly flat loss landscape, rendering the usage of gradient-based optimization methods highly challenging. Furthermore, by employing quantitative metrics, such as the Fisher information and effective dimensions, we show that classical TNs require a more extensive training sample to represent the data as efficiently as TN-inspired quantum circuits. We also engage with the idea of hybrid classical-quantum TNs and show possible architectures to employ a larger phase-space from the data. We offer our results using three main TN ansatz: Tree Tensor Networks, Matrix Product States, and Multi-scale Entanglement Renormalisation Ansatz.