Contrasting random and learned features in deep Bayesian linear regression
This work incrementally clarifies how architectural choices like feature learning impact generalization in simple deep regression models for theoretical deep learning.
The study compared deep Bayesian linear neural networks with random features versus fully trained layers on Gaussian data, finding that both exhibit sample-wise double-descent with label noise, but only random feature models show model-wise double-descent with bottlenecks, and optimal widths vary between models.
Understanding how feature learning affects generalization is among the foremost goals of modern deep learning theory. Here, we study how the ability to learn representations affects the generalization performance of a simple class of models: deep Bayesian linear neural networks trained on unstructured Gaussian data. By comparing deep random feature models to deep networks in which all layers are trained, we provide a detailed characterization of the interplay between width, depth, data density, and prior mismatch. We show that both models display sample-wise double-descent behavior in the presence of label noise. Random feature models can also display model-wise double-descent if there are narrow bottleneck layers, while deep networks do not show these divergences. Random feature models can have particular widths that are optimal for generalization at a given data density, while making neural networks as wide or as narrow as possible is always optimal. Moreover, we show that the leading-order correction to the kernel-limit learning curve cannot distinguish between random feature models and deep networks in which all layers are trained. Taken together, our findings begin to elucidate how architectural details affect generalization performance in this simple class of deep regression models.