LGCRSIMar 23, 2022

Ethereum Fraud Detection with Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks

arXiv:2203.12363v333 citationsh-index: 29
Originality Synthesis-oriented
AI Analysis

This addresses fraud detection for cryptocurrency users, but it is incremental as it focuses on comparing existing GNN models on a specific dataset.

The paper tackled fraud detection in Ethereum transaction networks by comparing homogeneous and heterogeneous graph neural network models, finding that heterogeneous models performed better with the RGCN model achieving the best overall metrics.

While transactions with cryptocurrencies such as Ethereum are becoming more prevalent, fraud and other criminal transactions are not uncommon. Graph analysis algorithms and machine learning techniques detect suspicious transactions that lead to phishing in large transaction networks. Many graph neural network (GNN) models have been proposed to apply deep learning techniques to graph structures. Although there is research on phishing detection using GNN models in the Ethereum transaction network, models that address the scale of the number of vertices and edges and the imbalance of labels have not yet been studied. In this paper, we compared the model performance of GNN models on the actual Ethereum transaction network dataset and phishing reported label data to exhaustively compare and verify which GNN models and hyperparameters produce the best accuracy. Specifically, we evaluated the model performance of representative homogeneous GNN models which consider single-type nodes and edges and heterogeneous GNN models which support different types of nodes and edges. We showed that heterogeneous models had better model performance than homogeneous models. In particular, the RGCN model achieved the best performance in the overall metrics.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes