AxIoU: An Axiomatically Justified Measure for Video Moment Retrieval
This work addresses evaluation challenges for researchers in video retrieval, offering a more reliable metric, though it is incremental as it builds on existing evaluation frameworks.
The paper tackles the problem of evaluating Video Moment Retrieval (VMR) systems by proposing AxIoU, an alternative measure that addresses rank-insensitivity and binarization issues in the conventional R@K,θ metric, showing it satisfies key axioms and empirically examining its agreement and stability.
Evaluation measures have a crucial impact on the direction of research. Therefore, it is of utmost importance to develop appropriate and reliable evaluation measures for new applications where conventional measures are not well suited. Video Moment Retrieval (VMR) is one such application, and the current practice is to use R@$K,θ$ for evaluating VMR systems. However, this measure has two disadvantages. First, it is rank-insensitive: It ignores the rank positions of successfully localised moments in the top-$K$ ranked list by treating the list as a set. Second, it binarizes the Intersection over Union (IoU) of each retrieved video moment using the threshold $θ$ and thereby ignoring fine-grained localisation quality of ranked moments. We propose an alternative measure for evaluating VMR, called Average Max IoU (AxIoU), which is free from the above two problems. We show that AxIoU satisfies two important axioms for VMR evaluation, namely, \textbf{Invariance against Redundant Moments} and \textbf{Monotonicity with respect to the Best Moment}, and also that R@$K,θ$ satisfies the first axiom only. We also empirically examine how AxIoU agrees with R@$K,θ$, as well as its stability with respect to change in the test data and human-annotated temporal boundaries.