Continuous-Time User Preference Modelling for Temporal Sets Prediction
This addresses the challenge of capturing continuously evolving user preferences in temporal sets prediction, which is incremental by building on prior indirect learning methods.
The paper tackles the problem of temporal sets prediction by proposing a continuous-time user preference modeling framework that explicitly models evolving user preferences, achieving state-of-the-art results on four real-world datasets under transductive and inductive settings.
Given a sequence of sets, where each set has a timestamp and contains an arbitrary number of elements, temporal sets prediction aims to predict the elements in the subsequent set. Previous studies for temporal sets prediction mainly focus on the modelling of elements and implicitly represent each user's preference based on his/her interacted elements. However, user preferences are often continuously evolving and the evolutionary trend cannot be fully captured with the indirect learning paradigm of user preferences. To this end, we propose a continuous-time user preference modelling framework for temporal sets prediction, which explicitly models the evolving preference of each user by maintaining a memory bank to store the states of all the users and elements. Specifically, we first construct a universal sequence by arranging all the user-set interactions in a non-descending temporal order, and then chronologically learn from each user-set interaction. For each interaction, we continuously update the memories of the related user and elements based on their currently encoded messages and past memories. Moreover, we present a personalized user behavior learning module to discover user-specific characteristics based on each user's historical sequence, which aggregates the previously interacted elements from dual perspectives according to the user and elements. Finally, we develop a set-batch algorithm to improve the model efficiency, which can create time-consistent batches in advance and achieve 3.5x and 3.0x speedups in the training and evaluation process on average. Experiments on four real-world datasets demonstrate the superiority of our approach over state-of-the-arts under both transductive and inductive settings. The good interpretability of our method is also shown.