Near-Optimal Distributed Linear-Quadratic Regulator for Networked Systems
This addresses the problem of designing efficient controllers for large-scale networked systems, offering a theoretical guarantee for near-optimal performance with moderate decentralization, which is incremental but practically relevant.
The paper tackles the trade-off between decentralization and performance in distributed control for networked systems, showing that a κ-distributed controller achieves near-optimal performance with an exponentially small error in κ compared to centralized control.
This paper studies the trade-off between the degree of decentralization and the performance of a distributed controller in a linear-quadratic control setting. We study a system of interconnected agents over a graph and a distributed controller, called $κ$-distributed control, which lets the agents make control decisions based on the state information within distance $κ$ on the underlying graph. This controller can tune its degree of decentralization using the parameter $κ$ and thus allows a characterization of the relationship between decentralization and performance. We show that under mild assumptions, including stabilizability, detectability, and a subexponentially growing graph condition, the performance difference between $κ$-distributed control and centralized optimal control becomes exponentially small in $κ$. This result reveals that distributed control can achieve near-optimal performance with a moderate degree of decentralization, and thus it is an effective controller architecture for large-scale networked systems.