CLLGMar 25, 2022

Predicting Clinical Intent from Free Text Electronic Health Records

arXiv:2204.09594v11 citationsh-index: 15
Originality Synthesis-oriented
AI Analysis

This work addresses a specific clinical workflow issue for healthcare providers, but it is incremental as it applies an existing method to a new dataset with limited scope.

The paper tackled the problem of detecting clinician intent from free-text electronic health records to prevent patients from being lost to follow-up, achieving an average macro-F1 score of 0.90 for 11 intents using a BERT-based model.

After a patient consultation, a clinician determines the steps in the management of the patient. A clinician may for example request to see the patient again or refer them to a specialist. Whilst most clinicians will record their intent as "next steps" in the patient's clinical notes, in some cases the clinician may forget to indicate their intent as an order or request, e.g. failure to place the follow-up order. This consequently results in patients becoming lost-to-follow up and may in some cases lead to adverse consequences. In this paper we train a machine learning model to detect a clinician's intent to follow up with a patient from the patient's clinical notes. Annotators systematically identified 22 possible types of clinical intent and annotated 3000 Bariatric clinical notes. The annotation process revealed a class imbalance in the labeled data and we found that there was only sufficient labeled data to train 11 out of the 22 intents. We used the data to train a BERT based multilabel classification model and reported the following average accuracy metrics for all intents: macro-precision: 0.91, macro-recall: 0.90, macro-f1: 0.90.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes