CLApr 22, 2022

Revise and Resubmit: An Intertextual Model of Text-based Collaboration in Peer Review

arXiv:2204.10805v2235 citationsh-index: 81
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This addresses the need for editorial assistance in peer review across scientific fields, though it is incremental as it builds on existing intertextuality theory and focuses on a specific domain.

The authors tackled the lack of frameworks and datasets for modeling interactions between pairs of texts in peer review, proposing the first intertextual model and creating the first annotated multi-domain corpus for journal-style post-publication open peer review, with the resource and code made publicly available.

Peer review is a key component of the publishing process in most fields of science. The increasing submission rates put a strain on reviewing quality and efficiency, motivating the development of applications to support the reviewing and editorial work. While existing NLP studies focus on the analysis of individual texts, editorial assistance often requires modeling interactions between pairs of texts -- yet general frameworks and datasets to support this scenario are missing. Relationships between texts are the core object of the intertextuality theory -- a family of approaches in literary studies not yet operationalized in NLP. Inspired by prior theoretical work, we propose the first intertextual model of text-based collaboration, which encompasses three major phenomena that make up a full iteration of the review-revise-and-resubmit cycle: pragmatic tagging, linking and long-document version alignment. While peer review is used across the fields of science and publication formats, existing datasets solely focus on conference-style review in computer science. Addressing this, we instantiate our proposed model in the first annotated multi-domain corpus in journal-style post-publication open peer review, and provide detailed insights into the practical aspects of intertextual annotation. Our resource is a major step towards multi-domain, fine-grained applications of NLP in editorial support for peer review, and our intertextual framework paves the path for general-purpose modeling of text-based collaboration. Our corpus and accompanying code are publicly available.

Code Implementations1 repo
Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes