A Comparative Study on Approaches to Acoustic Scene Classification using CNNs
This work addresses acoustic scene classification for sound analysis applications, but it is incremental as it compares existing methods on a limited dataset.
The paper tackled the problem of acoustic scene classification by comparing three sound representations—spectrograms, MFCCs, and embeddings—using CNNs and autoencoders, finding that spectrograms achieved the highest classification accuracy while MFCCs had the lowest.
Acoustic scene classification is a process of characterizing and classifying the environments from sound recordings. The first step is to generate features (representations) from the recorded sound and then classify the background environments. However, different kinds of representations have dramatic effects on the accuracy of the classification. In this paper, we explored the three such representations on classification accuracy using neural networks. We investigated the spectrograms, MFCCs, and embeddings representations using different CNN networks and autoencoders. Our dataset consists of sounds from three settings of indoors and outdoors environments - thus the dataset contains sound from six different kinds of environments. We found that the spectrogram representation has the highest classification accuracy while MFCC has the lowest classification accuracy. We reported our findings, insights as well as some guidelines to achieve better accuracy for environment classification using sounds.