SHAPE: An Unified Approach to Evaluate the Contribution and Cooperation of Individual Modalities
This work addresses the need for better evaluation metrics in multi-modal learning, which is incremental as it builds on existing fusion methods without introducing new ones.
The authors tackled the problem of quantifying individual modality contributions and cross-modal cooperation in multi-modal models, proposing SHAPE scores to evaluate fusion methods across datasets and tasks, finding that models often rely on dominant modalities and benefit from early fusion when modalities are indispensable.
As deep learning advances, there is an ever-growing demand for models capable of synthesizing information from multi-modal resources to address the complex tasks raised from real-life applications. Recently, many large multi-modal datasets have been collected, on which researchers actively explore different methods of fusing multi-modal information. However, little attention has been paid to quantifying the contribution of different modalities within the proposed models. In this paper, we propose the {\bf SH}apley v{\bf A}lue-based {\bf PE}rceptual (SHAPE) scores that measure the marginal contribution of individual modalities and the degree of cooperation across modalities. Using these scores, we systematically evaluate different fusion methods on different multi-modal datasets for different tasks. Our experiments suggest that for some tasks where different modalities are complementary, the multi-modal models still tend to use the dominant modality alone and ignore the cooperation across modalities. On the other hand, models learn to exploit cross-modal cooperation when different modalities are indispensable for the task. In this case, the scores indicate it is better to fuse different modalities at relatively early stages. We hope our scores can help improve the understanding of how the present multi-modal models operate on different modalities and encourage more sophisticated methods of integrating multiple modalities.