ASAICLLGSDMay 9, 2022

NaturalSpeech: End-to-End Text to Speech Synthesis with Human-Level Quality

Microsoft
arXiv:2205.04421v2334 citationsh-index: 91
AI Analysis

This work addresses the challenge of producing speech indistinguishable from humans for applications like virtual assistants and accessibility tools, representing a significant advance rather than an incremental improvement.

The paper tackles the problem of achieving human-level quality in text-to-speech synthesis by defining criteria based on statistical significance and developing the NaturalSpeech system, which achieves a CMOS score of -0.01 compared to human recordings on the LJSpeech dataset, showing no statistically significant difference.

Text to speech (TTS) has made rapid progress in both academia and industry in recent years. Some questions naturally arise that whether a TTS system can achieve human-level quality, how to define/judge that quality and how to achieve it. In this paper, we answer these questions by first defining the human-level quality based on the statistical significance of subjective measure and introducing appropriate guidelines to judge it, and then developing a TTS system called NaturalSpeech that achieves human-level quality on a benchmark dataset. Specifically, we leverage a variational autoencoder (VAE) for end-to-end text to waveform generation, with several key modules to enhance the capacity of the prior from text and reduce the complexity of the posterior from speech, including phoneme pre-training, differentiable duration modeling, bidirectional prior/posterior modeling, and a memory mechanism in VAE. Experiment evaluations on popular LJSpeech dataset show that our proposed NaturalSpeech achieves -0.01 CMOS (comparative mean opinion score) to human recordings at the sentence level, with Wilcoxon signed rank test at p-level p >> 0.05, which demonstrates no statistically significant difference from human recordings for the first time on this dataset.

Code Implementations3 repos
Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes