CLMay 19, 2022

Gender Bias in Meta-Embeddings

arXiv:2205.09867v3297 citationsh-index: 32
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This addresses fairness issues in NLP for users of meta-embeddings, but it is incremental as it builds on existing debiasing methods.

The paper tackles the problem of gender bias amplification in meta-embeddings, finding that meta-embedding amplifies biases compared to input sources and proposing a novel debiasing method that uses multiple debiasing techniques on a single source to create an unbiased meta-embedding.

Different methods have been proposed to develop meta-embeddings from a given set of source embeddings. However, the source embeddings can contain unfair gender-related biases, and how these influence the meta-embeddings has not been studied yet. We study the gender bias in meta-embeddings created under three different settings: (1) meta-embedding multiple sources without performing any debiasing (Multi-Source No-Debiasing), (2) meta-embedding multiple sources debiased by a single method (Multi-Source Single-Debiasing), and (3) meta-embedding a single source debiased by different methods (Single-Source Multi-Debiasing). Our experimental results show that meta-embedding amplifies the gender biases compared to input source embeddings. We find that debiasing not only the sources but also their meta-embedding is needed to mitigate those biases. Moreover, we propose a novel debiasing method based on meta-embedding learning where we use multiple debiasing methods on a single source embedding and then create a single unbiased meta-embedding.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes