SIITLGMay 24, 2022

Inference of a Rumor's Source in the Independent Cascade Model

arXiv:2205.12125v18 citationsh-index: 26
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This addresses the patient zero problem in epidemiology and rumor spreading, offering a method for source inference in networks, though it is incremental as it builds on existing models and prior work.

The paper tackles the problem of inferring the source of a rumor in the Independent Cascade Model, given a snapshot of infected nodes, and shows that the maximum likelihood estimator exhibits a non-trivial phase transition in cycle-free graphs, with rigorous analysis for trees and empirical validation in general networks.

We consider the so-called Independent Cascade Model for rumor spreading or epidemic processes popularized by Kempe et al.\ [2003]. In this model, a small subset of nodes from a network are the source of a rumor. In discrete time steps, each informed node "infects" each of its uninformed neighbors with probability $p$. While many facets of this process are studied in the literature, less is known about the inference problem: given a number of infected nodes in a network, can we learn the source of the rumor? In the context of epidemiology this problem is often referred to as patient zero problem. It belongs to a broader class of problems where the goal is to infer parameters of the underlying spreading model, see, e.g., Lokhov [NeurIPS'16] or Mastakouri et al. [NeurIPS'20]. In this work we present a maximum likelihood estimator for the rumor's source, given a snapshot of the process in terms of a set of active nodes $X$ after $t$ steps. Our results show that, for cycle-free graphs, the likelihood estimator undergoes a non-trivial phase transition as a function $t$. We provide a rigorous analysis for two prominent classes of acyclic network, namely $d$-regular trees and Galton-Watson trees, and verify empirically that our heuristics work well in various general networks.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes