MLLGMay 27, 2022

Error Bound of Empirical $\ell_2$ Risk Minimization for Noisy Standard and Generalized Phase Retrieval Problems

arXiv:2205.13827v29 citationsh-index: 13
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This work provides improved theoretical guarantees for signal recovery in phase retrieval, which is incremental but relevant for applications in imaging and signal processing.

The paper tackles the problem of estimating error bounds for empirical risk minimization in noisy phase retrieval problems, deriving tighter bounds for arbitrary noise and proposing a robust estimator for heavy-tailed noise, with results extending to rank-r matrix recovery.

In this paper, we study the estimation performance of empirical $\ell_2$ risk minimization (ERM) in noisy (standard) phase retrieval (NPR) given by $y_k = |α_k^*x_0|^2+η_k$, or noisy generalized phase retrieval (NGPR) formulated as $y_k = x_0^*A_kx_0 + η_k$, where $x_0\in\mathbb{K}^d$ is the desired signal, $n$ is the sample size, $η= (η_1,...,η_n)^\top$ is the noise vector. We establish new error bounds under different noise patterns, and our proofs are valid for both $\mathbb{K}=\mathbb{R}$ and $\mathbb{K}=\mathbb{C}$. In NPR under arbitrary noise vector $η$, we derive a new error bound $O\big(\|η\|_\infty\sqrt{\frac{d}{n}} + \frac{|\mathbf{1}^\topη|}{n}\big)$, which is tighter than the currently known one $O\big(\frac{\|η\|}{\sqrt{n}}\big)$ in many cases. In NGPR, we show $O\big(\|η\|\frac{\sqrt{d}}{n}\big)$ for arbitrary $η$. In both problems, the bounds for arbitrary noise immediately give rise to $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{\frac{d}{n}})$ for sub-Gaussian or sub-exponential random noise, with some conventional but inessential assumptions (e.g., independent or zero-mean condition) removed or weakened. In addition, we make a first attempt to ERM under heavy-tailed random noise assumed to have bounded $l$-th moment. To achieve a trade-off between bias and variance, we truncate the responses and propose a corresponding robust ERM estimator, which is shown to possess the guarantee $\tilde{O}\big(\big[\sqrt{\frac{d}{n}}\big]^{1-1/l}\big)$ in both NPR, NGPR. All the error bounds straightforwardly extend to the more general problems of rank-$r$ matrix recovery, and these results deliver a conclusion that the full-rank frame $\{A_k\}_{k=1}^n$ in NGPR is more robust to biased noise than the rank-1 frame $\{α_kα_k^*\}_{k=1}^n$ in NPR. Extensive experimental results are presented to illustrate our theoretical findings.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes