LGCROCMLJun 1, 2022

Bring Your Own Algorithm for Optimal Differentially Private Stochastic Minimax Optimization

ETH Zurich
arXiv:2206.00363v224 citationsh-index: 43
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This work addresses the challenge of balancing privacy and performance in machine learning optimization for practitioners, though it is incremental as it builds on existing methods like Phased-ERM.

The paper tackles the problem of differentially private stochastic minimax optimization by introducing a general framework that allows practitioners to use any base optimization algorithm as a black-box to achieve near-optimal privacy-loss trade-offs with near-linear time complexity, resulting in the first near-linear time algorithms with near-optimal guarantees for smooth DP-SMO.

We study differentially private (DP) algorithms for smooth stochastic minimax optimization, with stochastic minimization as a byproduct. The holy grail of these settings is to guarantee the optimal trade-off between the privacy and the excess population loss, using an algorithm with a linear time-complexity in the number of training samples. We provide a general framework for solving differentially private stochastic minimax optimization (DP-SMO) problems, which enables the practitioners to bring their own base optimization algorithm and use it as a black-box to obtain the near-optimal privacy-loss trade-off. Our framework is inspired from the recently proposed Phased-ERM method [22] for nonsmooth differentially private stochastic convex optimization (DP-SCO), which exploits the stability of the empirical risk minimization (ERM) for the privacy guarantee. The flexibility of our approach enables us to sidestep the requirement that the base algorithm needs to have bounded sensitivity, and allows the use of sophisticated variance-reduced accelerated methods to achieve near-linear time-complexity. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first near-linear time algorithms with near-optimal guarantees on the population duality gap for smooth DP-SMO, when the objective is (strongly-)convex--(strongly-)concave. Additionally, based on our flexible framework, we enrich the family of near-linear time algorithms for smooth DP-SCO with the near-optimal privacy-loss trade-off.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes