LGCRJun 3, 2022

Adversarial Unlearning: Reducing Confidence Along Adversarial Directions

CMU
arXiv:2206.01367v125 citationsh-index: 166
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This is an incremental improvement for machine learning practitioners seeking better regularization techniques to enhance model generalization.

The paper tackles overfitting in supervised learning by introducing RCAD, a regularization method that reduces model confidence on adversarially generated out-of-distribution examples, resulting in 1-3% absolute test accuracy improvements on classification benchmarks.

Supervised learning methods trained with maximum likelihood objectives often overfit on training data. Most regularizers that prevent overfitting look to increase confidence on additional examples (e.g., data augmentation, adversarial training), or reduce it on training data (e.g., label smoothing). In this work we propose a complementary regularization strategy that reduces confidence on self-generated examples. The method, which we call RCAD (Reducing Confidence along Adversarial Directions), aims to reduce confidence on out-of-distribution examples lying along directions adversarially chosen to increase training loss. In contrast to adversarial training, RCAD does not try to robustify the model to output the original label, but rather regularizes it to have reduced confidence on points generated using much larger perturbations than in conventional adversarial training. RCAD can be easily integrated into training pipelines with a few lines of code. Despite its simplicity, we find on many classification benchmarks that RCAD can be added to existing techniques (e.g., label smoothing, MixUp training) to increase test accuracy by 1-3% in absolute value, with more significant gains in the low data regime. We also provide a theoretical analysis that helps to explain these benefits in simplified settings, showing that RCAD can provably help the model unlearn spurious features in the training data.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes