On Convergence of FedProx: Local Dissimilarity Invariant Bounds, Non-smoothness and Beyond
This provides foundational theoretical insights for federated learning practitioners, though it is incremental as it builds on existing FedProx methods.
The paper tackled the lack of theoretical understanding of FedProx in federated learning by developing a convergence theory that removes unrealistic assumptions, resulting in guarantees independent of local dissimilarity and applicable to non-smooth problems, with linear speedup in minibatch and device sampling.
The FedProx algorithm is a simple yet powerful distributed proximal point optimization method widely used for federated learning (FL) over heterogeneous data. Despite its popularity and remarkable success witnessed in practice, the theoretical understanding of FedProx is largely underinvestigated: the appealing convergence behavior of FedProx is so far characterized under certain non-standard and unrealistic dissimilarity assumptions of local functions, and the results are limited to smooth optimization problems. In order to remedy these deficiencies, we develop a novel local dissimilarity invariant convergence theory for FedProx and its minibatch stochastic extension through the lens of algorithmic stability. As a result, we contribute to derive several new and deeper insights into FedProx for non-convex federated optimization including: 1) convergence guarantees independent on local dissimilarity type conditions; 2) convergence guarantees for non-smooth FL problems; and 3) linear speedup with respect to size of minibatch and number of sampled devices. Our theory for the first time reveals that local dissimilarity and smoothness are not must-have for FedProx to get favorable complexity bounds. Preliminary experimental results on a series of benchmark FL datasets are reported to demonstrate the benefit of minibatching for improving the sample efficiency of FedProx.