Evaluating Generative Patent Language Models
This work addresses the need for better evaluation metrics in the patent domain to assist human writers, though it is incremental as it applies existing methods to a new context.
The study tackled the problem of evaluating generative language models for patent writing by introducing a human-centric metric based on keystroke savings from autocompletion, finding that larger models (up to 6B parameters) do not always perform best, with specific ratios indicating efficiency gains.
Generative language models are promising for assisting human writing in various domains. This manuscript aims to build generative language models in the patent domain and evaluate model performance from a human-centric perspective. The perspective is to measure the ratio of keystrokes that can be saved by autocompletion based on generative patent language models. A higher ratio means a more effective model which can save more keystrokes. This metric can be used to benchmark model performance. The metric is different from conventional machine-centric metrics that are token-based instead of keystroke-based. In terms of model size, the largest model built in this manuscript is 6B, which is state-of-the-art in the patent domain. Based on the metric, it is found that the largest model is not necessarily the best for the human-centric metric. The finding means that keeping increasing model sizes in the patent domain might be unnecessary if the purpose is to assist human writing with autocompletion. Several patent language models are pre-trained from scratch in this research. The pre-trained models are released for future researchers. Several visualization tools are also provided. The importance of building a generative language model in the patent domain is the potential to facilitate creativity and innovations in the future.