LGNEJul 2, 2022

A Structured Sparse Neural Network and Its Matrix Calculations Algorithm

arXiv:2207.00903v1h-index: 11
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This work addresses computational bottlenecks in neural network training for real-time applications, though it appears incremental as it builds on existing pseudoinverse and sparse matrix methods.

The paper tackles the computational inefficiency of training neural networks by introducing a structured sparse matrix design and efficient algorithms for its pseudoinverse and determinant calculations, showing significant improvement in computational costs as matrix size increases.

Gradient descent optimizations and backpropagation are the most common methods for training neural networks, but they are computationally expensive for real time applications, need high memory resources, and are difficult to converge for many networks and large datasets. [Pseudo]inverse models for training neural network have emerged as powerful tools to overcome these issues. In order to effectively implement these methods, structured pruning maybe be applied to produce sparse neural networks. Although sparse neural networks are efficient in memory usage, most of their algorithms use the same fully loaded matrix calculation methods which are not efficient for sparse matrices. Tridiagonal matrices are one of the frequently used candidates for structuring neural networks, but they are not flexible enough to handle underfitting and overfitting problems as well as generalization properties. In this paper, we introduce a nonsymmetric, tridiagonal matrix with offdiagonal sparse entries and offset sub and super-diagonals as well algorithms for its [pseudo]inverse and determinant calculations. Traditional algorithms for matrix calculations, specifically inversion and determinant, of these forms are not efficient specially for large matrices, e.g. larger datasets or deeper networks. A decomposition for lower triangular matrices is developed and the original matrix is factorized into a set of matrices where their inverse matrices are calculated. For the cases where the matrix inverse does not exist, a least square type pseudoinverse is provided. The present method is a direct routine, i.e., executes in a predictable number of operations which is tested for randomly generated matrices with varying size. The results show significant improvement in computational costs specially when the size of matrix increases.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes