Differentially Private Counterfactuals via Functional Mechanism
This work addresses privacy risks in model explanations for users and developers, offering a novel method to secure counterfactuals, though it is incremental in applying differential privacy to this specific domain.
The paper tackles the problem of generating counterfactual explanations for model decisions while protecting sensitive information, proposing a differentially private framework that injects noise into class prototypes via an autoencoder and functional mechanism, achieving effective defense against extraction and inference attacks.
Counterfactual, serving as one emerging type of model explanation, has attracted tons of attentions recently from both industry and academia. Different from the conventional feature-based explanations (e.g., attributions), counterfactuals are a series of hypothetical samples which can flip model decisions with minimal perturbations on queries. Given valid counterfactuals, humans are capable of reasoning under ``what-if'' circumstances, so as to better understand the model decision boundaries. However, releasing counterfactuals could be detrimental, since it may unintentionally leak sensitive information to adversaries, which brings about higher risks on both model security and data privacy. To bridge the gap, in this paper, we propose a novel framework to generate differentially private counterfactual (DPC) without touching the deployed model or explanation set, where noises are injected for protection while maintaining the explanation roles of counterfactual. In particular, we train an autoencoder with the functional mechanism to construct noisy class prototypes, and then derive the DPC from the latent prototypes based on the post-processing immunity of differential privacy. Further evaluations demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed framework, showing that DPC can successfully relieve the risks on both extraction and inference attacks.