CVAIAug 8, 2022

Abutting Grating Illusion: Cognitive Challenge to Neural Network Models

arXiv:2208.03958v11 citationsh-index: 3
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This addresses the challenge of evaluating AI robustness using human cognitive phenomena, though it is incremental in applying a known illusion to new datasets.

The study tackled the problem of deep learning models lacking fundamental abilities compared to humans by proposing a novel corruption method based on the abutting grating illusion, which caused most state-of-the-art models to perform near random guessing, but found that the DeepAugment technique significantly improved robustness.

Even the state-of-the-art deep learning models lack fundamental abilities compared to humans. Multiple comparison paradigms have been proposed to explore the distinctions between humans and deep learning. While most comparisons rely on corruptions inspired by mathematical transformations, very few have bases on human cognitive phenomena. In this study, we propose a novel corruption method based on the abutting grating illusion, which is a visual phenomenon widely discovered in both human and a wide range of animal species. The corruption method destroys the gradient-defined boundaries and generates the perception of illusory contours using line gratings abutting each other. We applied the method on MNIST, high resolution MNIST, and silhouette object images. Various deep learning models are tested on the corruption, including models trained from scratch and 109 models pretrained with ImageNet or various data augmentation techniques. Our results show that abutting grating corruption is challenging even for state-of-the-art deep learning models because most models are randomly guessing. We also discovered that the DeepAugment technique can greatly improve robustness against abutting grating illusion. Visualisation of early layers indicates that better performing models exhibit stronger end-stopping property, which is consistent with neuroscience discoveries. To validate the corruption method, 24 human subjects are involved to classify samples of corrupted datasets.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes