Evaluating Dense Passage Retrieval using Transformers
This work addresses the problem of inconsistent evaluations for researchers in information retrieval, though it is incremental as it formalizes existing practices rather than introducing new methods.
The authors tackled the lack of a standardized evaluation framework for dense passage retrieval models based on Transformers by formalizing best practices and conventions, resulting in a framework that uses MSMARCO dev set and MRR@100 for fair comparisons.
Although representational retrieval models based on Transformers have been able to make major advances in the past few years, and despite the widely accepted conventions and best-practices for testing such models, a $\textit{standardized}$ evaluation framework for testing them has not been developed. In this work, we formalize the best practices and conventions followed by researchers in the literature, paving the path for more standardized evaluations - and therefore more fair comparisons between the models. Our framework (1) embeds the documents and queries; (2) for each query-document pair, computes the relevance score based on the dot product of the document and query embedding; (3) uses the $\texttt{dev}$ set of the MSMARCO dataset to evaluate the models; (4) uses the $\texttt{trec_eval}$ script to calculate MRR@100, which is the primary metric used to evaluate the models. Most importantly, we showcase the use of this framework by experimenting on some of the most well-known dense retrieval models.