LGMLSep 2, 2022

Optimizing the Performative Risk under Weak Convexity Assumptions

Princeton
arXiv:2209.00771v46 citationsh-index: 10
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This work addresses a foundational challenge in machine learning where models influence data distributions, with incremental improvements for theoretical optimization in closed-loop settings.

The paper tackles the non-convex optimization problem in performative prediction by relaxing prior convexity assumptions to weaker notions, enabling iterative optimization methods to minimize the performative risk effectively.

In performative prediction, a predictive model impacts the distribution that generates future data, a phenomenon that is being ignored in classical supervised learning. In this closed-loop setting, the natural measure of performance named performative risk ($\mathrm{PR}$), captures the expected loss incurred by a predictive model \emph{after} deployment. The core difficulty of using the performative risk as an optimization objective is that the data distribution itself depends on the model parameters. This dependence is governed by the environment and not under the control of the learner. As a consequence, even the choice of a convex loss function can result in a highly non-convex $\mathrm{PR}$ minimization problem. Prior work has identified a pair of general conditions on the loss and the mapping from model parameters to distributions that implies the convexity of the performative risk. In this paper, we relax these assumptions and focus on obtaining weaker notions of convexity, without sacrificing the amenability of the $\mathrm{PR}$ minimization problem for iterative optimization methods.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes