Text Detection Forgot About Document OCR
This addresses the problem of incomplete evaluation in text detection for document OCR, highlighting a gap in performance comparisons for researchers and practitioners.
The paper compared state-of-the-art methods for in-the-wild and document text recognition on structured documents, finding that in-the-wild methods achieve competitive results, outperforming available OCR methods.
Detection and recognition of text from scans and other images, commonly denoted as Optical Character Recognition (OCR), is a widely used form of automated document processing with a number of methods available. Yet OCR systems still do not achieve 100% accuracy, requiring human corrections in applications where correct readout is essential. Advances in machine learning enabled even more challenging scenarios of text detection and recognition "in-the-wild" - such as detecting text on objects from photographs of complex scenes. While the state-of-the-art methods for in-the-wild text recognition are typically evaluated on complex scenes, their performance in the domain of documents is typically not published, and a comprehensive comparison with methods for document OCR is missing. This paper compares several methods designed for in-the-wild text recognition and for document text recognition, and provides their evaluation on the domain of structured documents. The results suggest that state-of-the-art methods originally proposed for in-the-wild text detection also achieve competitive results on document text detection, outperforming available OCR methods. We argue that the application of document OCR should not be omitted in evaluation of text detection and recognition methods.