An Information-Theoretic Analysis of Compute-Optimal Neural Scaling Laws
This provides a theoretical foundation for scaling laws in neural networks, which is incremental as it builds on prior empirical work like Chinchilla but offers new mathematical insights.
The paper tackles the compute-optimal trade-off between model and data sizes in neural networks, deriving an information-theoretic upper bound on error and showing that the optimal allocation asymptotically follows a linear scaling law, with empirical results supporting this finding.
We study the compute-optimal trade-off between model and training data set sizes for large neural networks. Our result suggests a linear relation similar to that supported by the empirical analysis of chinchilla. While that work studies transformer-based large language models trained on the MassiveText corpus gopher, as a starting point for development of a mathematical theory, we focus on a simpler learning model and data generating process, each based on a neural network with a sigmoidal output unit and single hidden layer of ReLU activation units. We introduce general error upper bounds for a class of algorithms which incrementally update a statistic (for example gradient descent). For a particular learning model inspired by barron 1993, we establish an upper bound on the minimal information-theoretically achievable expected error as a function of model and data set sizes. We then derive allocations of computation that minimize this bound. We present empirical results which suggest that this approximation correctly identifies an asymptotic linear compute-optimal scaling. This approximation also generates new insights. Among other things, it suggests that, as the input dimension or latent space complexity grows, as might be the case for example if a longer history of tokens is taken as input to a language model, a larger fraction of the compute budget should be allocated to growing the learning model rather than training data.