Evaluation and Improvement of Interpretability for Self-Explainable Part-Prototype Networks
This work addresses the challenge of making interpretable AI models more reliable for practical applications, though it is incremental as it builds on existing part-prototype networks.
The paper tackles the problem of fragile interpretability in part-prototype networks by proposing quantitative evaluation metrics and an improved model, achieving significantly superior performance in accuracy and interpretability on three benchmarks across nine architectures.
Part-prototype networks (e.g., ProtoPNet, ProtoTree, and ProtoPool) have attracted broad research interest for their intrinsic interpretability and comparable accuracy to non-interpretable counterparts. However, recent works find that the interpretability from prototypes is fragile, due to the semantic gap between the similarities in the feature space and that in the input space. In this work, we strive to address this challenge by making the first attempt to quantitatively and objectively evaluate the interpretability of the part-prototype networks. Specifically, we propose two evaluation metrics, termed as consistency score and stability score, to evaluate the explanation consistency across images and the explanation robustness against perturbations, respectively, both of which are essential for explanations taken into practice. Furthermore, we propose an elaborated part-prototype network with a shallow-deep feature alignment (SDFA) module and a score aggregation (SA) module to improve the interpretability of prototypes. We conduct systematical evaluation experiments and provide substantial discussions to uncover the interpretability of existing part-prototype networks. Experiments on three benchmarks across nine architectures demonstrate that our model achieves significantly superior performance to the state of the art, in both the accuracy and interpretability. Our code is available at https://github.com/hqhQAQ/EvalProtoPNet.