Can Persistent Homology provide an efficient alternative for Evaluation of Knowledge Graph Completion Methods?
This addresses the computational inefficiency and high carbon footprint of current evaluation methods for researchers and practitioners in knowledge graph completion.
The paper tackles the problem of slow evaluation times for Knowledge Graph completion methods by proposing a novel metric called Knowledge Persistence (KP) that uses persistent homology to assess quality with only a fraction of the data, reducing evaluation time by approximately 99.96% in experiments.
In this paper we present a novel method, $\textit{Knowledge Persistence}$ ($\mathcal{KP}$), for faster evaluation of Knowledge Graph (KG) completion approaches. Current ranking-based evaluation is quadratic in the size of the KG, leading to long evaluation times and consequently a high carbon footprint. $\mathcal{KP}$ addresses this by representing the topology of the KG completion methods through the lens of topological data analysis, concretely using persistent homology. The characteristics of persistent homology allow $\mathcal{KP}$ to evaluate the quality of the KG completion looking only at a fraction of the data. Experimental results on standard datasets show that the proposed metric is highly correlated with ranking metrics (Hits@N, MR, MRR). Performance evaluation shows that $\mathcal{KP}$ is computationally efficient: In some cases, the evaluation time (validation+test) of a KG completion method has been reduced from 18 hours (using Hits@10) to 27 seconds (using $\mathcal{KP}$), and on average (across methods & data) reduces the evaluation time (validation+test) by $\approx$ $\textbf{99.96}\%$.