DSLGFeb 13, 2023

Sparse Dimensionality Reduction Revisited

arXiv:2302.06165v13 citationsh-index: 29
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This work provides more efficient dimensionality reduction for applications where the input dimension is much smaller than the number of points, addressing a loophole in prior lower bounds.

The paper tackles the problem of improving sparsity in sparse Johnson-Lindenstrauss transforms for dimensionality reduction, achieving a new sparsity bound of s = O(ε^{-1}(lg n/lg(1/ε) + lg^{2/3}n lg^{1/3} d)) when d = o(n), which is tighter than the previous near-optimal bound of s = O(ε^{-1} lg n).

The sparse Johnson-Lindenstrauss transform is one of the central techniques in dimensionality reduction. It supports embedding a set of $n$ points in $\mathbb{R}^d$ into $m=O(\varepsilon^{-2} \lg n)$ dimensions while preserving all pairwise distances to within $1 \pm \varepsilon$. Each input point $x$ is embedded to $Ax$, where $A$ is an $m \times d$ matrix having $s$ non-zeros per column, allowing for an embedding time of $O(s \|x\|_0)$. Since the sparsity of $A$ governs the embedding time, much work has gone into improving the sparsity $s$. The current state-of-the-art by Kane and Nelson (JACM'14) shows that $s = O(\varepsilon ^{-1} \lg n)$ suffices. This is almost matched by a lower bound of $s = Ω(\varepsilon ^{-1} \lg n/\lg(1/\varepsilon))$ by Nelson and Nguyen (STOC'13). Previous work thus suggests that we have near-optimal embeddings. In this work, we revisit sparse embeddings and identify a loophole in the lower bound. Concretely, it requires $d \geq n$, which in many applications is unrealistic. We exploit this loophole to give a sparser embedding when $d = o(n)$, achieving $s = O(\varepsilon^{-1}(\lg n/\lg(1/\varepsilon)+\lg^{2/3}n \lg^{1/3} d))$. We also complement our analysis by strengthening the lower bound of Nelson and Nguyen to hold also when $d \ll n$, thereby matching the first term in our new sparsity upper bound. Finally, we also improve the sparsity of the best oblivious subspace embeddings for optimal embedding dimensionality.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes