NCAIFeb 13, 2023

Sources of Richness and Ineffability for Phenomenally Conscious States

arXiv:2302.06403v518 citationsh-index: 57
AI Analysis

This work addresses a longstanding issue in philosophy of mind, offering a physicalist explanation for the puzzling aspects of consciousness, though it is incremental in advancing theoretical models.

The authors tackled the philosophical problem of why conscious states are both rich in detail and ineffable by proposing an information-theoretic dynamical systems framework, linking richness to information content and ineffability to information loss during processing.

Conscious states (states that there is something it is like to be in) seem both rich or full of detail, and ineffable or hard to fully describe or recall. The problem of ineffability, in particular, is a longstanding issue in philosophy that partly motivates the explanatory gap: the belief that consciousness cannot be reduced to underlying physical processes. Here, we provide an information theoretic dynamical systems perspective on the richness and ineffability of consciousness. In our framework, the richness of conscious experience corresponds to the amount of information in a conscious state and ineffability corresponds to the amount of information lost at different stages of processing. We describe how attractor dynamics in working memory would induce impoverished recollections of our original experiences, how the discrete symbolic nature of language is insufficient for describing the rich and high-dimensional structure of experiences, and how similarity in the cognitive function of two individuals relates to improved communicability of their experiences to each other. While our model may not settle all questions relating to the explanatory gap, it makes progress toward a fully physicalist explanation of the richness and ineffability of conscious experience: two important aspects that seem to be part of what makes qualitative character so puzzling.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes