Netizens, Academicians, and Information Professionals' Opinions About AI With Special Reference To ChatGPT
This provides insights for academicians, content developers, and librarians on the adoption and limitations of AI tools like ChatGPT-3, but it is incremental as it focuses on perceptions without new technical advancements.
The study analyzed social media comments and surveyed information professionals to understand perceptions of ChatGPT-3, finding it is a valuable tool for research and writing but not 100% accurate and requires cross-checking, with most academicians starting to accept it.
This study aims to understand the perceptions and opinions of academicians towards ChatGPT-3 by collecting and analyzing social media comments, and a survey was conducted with library and information science professionals. The research uses a content analysis method and finds that while ChatGPT-3 can be a valuable tool for research and writing, it is not 100% accurate and should be cross-checked. The study also finds that while some academicians may not accept ChatGPT-3, most are starting to accept it. The study is beneficial for academicians, content developers, and librarians.