LGCVMar 13, 2023

Automated Vulnerability Detection in Source Code Using Quantum Natural Language Processing

arXiv:2303.07525v110 citationsh-index: 29Has Code
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This addresses software security for developers and auditors by improving vulnerability detection, though it appears incremental as it builds on existing quantum and classical methods.

The paper tackled automated vulnerability detection in C/C++ source code by developing a system using classical LSTM and quantum LSTM (QLSTM) models with semantic and syntactic features, finding that QLSTM with these features detects vulnerabilities more accurately and runs faster than classical LSTM.

One of the most important challenges in the field of software code audit is the presence of vulnerabilities in software source code. These flaws are highly likely ex-ploited and lead to system compromise, data leakage, or denial of ser-vice. C and C++ open source code are now available in order to create a large-scale, classical machine-learning and quantum machine-learning system for function-level vulnerability identification. We assembled a siz-able dataset of millions of open-source functions that point to poten-tial exploits. We created an efficient and scalable vulnerability detection method based on a deep neural network model Long Short Term Memory (LSTM), and quantum machine learning model Long Short Term Memory (QLSTM), that can learn features extracted from the source codes. The source code is first converted into a minimal intermediate representation to remove the pointless components and shorten the de-pendency. Therefore, We keep the semantic and syntactic information using state of the art word embedding algorithms such as Glove and fastText. The embedded vectors are subsequently fed into the classical and quantum convolutional neural networks to classify the possible vulnerabilities. To measure the performance, we used evaluation metrics such as F1 score, precision, re-call, accuracy, and total execution time. We made a comparison between the results derived from the classical LSTM and quantum LSTM using basic feature representation as well as semantic and syntactic represen-tation. We found that the QLSTM with semantic and syntactic features detects significantly accurate vulnerability and runs faster than its classical counterpart.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes