LGSYMar 16, 2023

Learning Spatio-Temporal Aggregations for Large-Scale Capacity Expansion Problems

arXiv:2303.08996v27 citationsh-index: 31
Originality Highly original
AI Analysis

This addresses the problem of suboptimal investment planning for regional-scale energy systems, offering a novel method to improve decision-making.

The paper tackles the computational intractability of large-scale Capacity Expansion Problems (CEPs) in energy systems by proposing a graph convolutional autoencoder for spatio-temporal aggregation, resulting in a 33% lower upper bound compared to benchmark spatial aggregation methods.

Effective investment planning decisions are crucial to ensure cyber-physical infrastructures satisfy performance requirements over an extended time horizon. Computing these decisions often requires solving Capacity Expansion Problems (CEPs). In the context of regional-scale energy systems, these problems are prohibitively expensive to solve due to large network sizes, heterogeneous node characteristics, and a large number of operational periods. To maintain tractability, traditional approaches aggregate network nodes and/or select a set of representative time periods. Often, these reductions do not capture supply-demand variations that crucially impact CEP costs and constraints, leading to suboptimal decisions. Here, we propose a novel graph convolutional autoencoder approach for spatio-temporal aggregation of a generic CEP with heterogeneous nodes (CEPHN). Our architecture leverages graph pooling to identify nodes with similar characteristics and minimizes a multi-objective loss function. This loss function is tailored to induce desirable spatial and temporal aggregations with regard to tractability and optimality. In particular, the output of the graph pooling provides a spatial aggregation while clustering the low-dimensional encoded representations yields a temporal aggregation. We apply our approach to generation expansion planning of a coupled 88-node power and natural gas system in New England. The resulting aggregation leads to a simpler CEPHN with 6 nodes and a small set of representative days selected from one year. We evaluate aggregation outcomes over a range of hyperparameters governing the loss function and compare resulting upper bounds on the original problem with those obtained using benchmark methods. We show that our approach provides upper bounds that are 33% (resp. 10%) lower those than obtained from benchmark spatial (resp. temporal) aggregation approaches.

Code Implementations1 repo
Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes