Unsupervised Facial Expression Representation Learning with Contrastive Local Warping
This addresses scaling and annotation bias in facial expression analysis, though it is incremental as it builds on existing self-supervised learning techniques.
The paper tackles unsupervised representation learning for facial expression analysis by proposing ContraWarping, a method using contrastive learning with global transformations and local warping, achieving 79.14% accuracy on RAF-DB for linear probing.
This paper investigates unsupervised representation learning for facial expression analysis. We think Unsupervised Facial Expression Representation (UFER) deserves exploration and has the potential to address some key challenges in facial expression analysis, such as scaling, annotation bias, the discrepancy between discrete labels and continuous emotions, and model pre-training. Such motivated, we propose a UFER method with contrastive local warping (ContraWarping), which leverages the insight that the emotional expression is robust to current global transformation (affine transformation, color jitter, etc.) but can be easily changed by random local warping. Therefore, given a facial image, ContraWarping employs some global transformations and local warping to generate its positive and negative samples and sets up a novel contrastive learning framework. Our in-depth investigation shows that: 1) the positive pairs from global transformations may be exploited with general self-supervised learning (e.g., BYOL) and already bring some informative features, and 2) the negative pairs from local warping explicitly introduce expression-related variation and further bring substantial improvement. Based on ContraWarping, we demonstrate the benefit of UFER under two facial expression analysis scenarios: facial expression recognition and image retrieval. For example, directly using ContraWarping features for linear probing achieves 79.14% accuracy on RAF-DB, significantly reducing the gap towards the full-supervised counterpart (88.92% / 84.81% with/without pre-training).