CVMar 20, 2023

From Sparse to Precise: A Practical Editing Approach for Intracardiac Echocardiography Segmentation

arXiv:2303.11041v21 citationsh-index: 10
AI Analysis

This addresses the need for precise cardiac structure segmentation in atrial fibrillation ablation procedures, though it appears incremental as an editing enhancement to existing segmentation methods.

The paper tackles inaccurate 3D segmentation in Intracardiac Echocardiography (ICE) imaging, which can cause clinical complications, by proposing an interactive editing framework that allows users to correct segmentations via scribbles on 2D frames, resulting in improved segmentation quality and preservation of previous edits.

Accurate and safe catheter ablation procedures for patients with atrial fibrillation require precise segmentation of cardiac structures in Intracardiac Echocardiography (ICE) imaging. Prior studies have suggested methods that employ 3D geometry information from the ICE transducer to create a sparse ICE volume by placing 2D frames in a 3D grid, enabling training of 3D segmentation models. However, the resulting 3D masks from these models can be inaccurate and may lead to serious clinical complications due to the sparse sampling in ICE data, frames misalignment, and cardiac motion. To address this issue, we propose an interactive editing framework that allows users to edit segmentation output by drawing scribbles on a 2D frame. The user interaction is mapped to the 3D grid and utilized to execute an editing step that modifies the segmentation in the vicinity of the interaction while preserving the previous segmentation away from the interaction. Furthermore, our framework accommodates multiple edits to the segmentation output in a sequential manner without compromising previous edits. This paper presents a novel loss function and a novel evaluation metric specifically designed for editing. Results from cross-validation and testing indicate that our proposed loss function outperforms standard losses and training strategies in terms of segmentation quality and following user input. Additionally, we show quantitatively and qualitatively that subsequent edits do not compromise previous edits when using our method, as opposed to standard segmentation losses. Overall, our approach enhances the accuracy of the segmentation while avoiding undesired changes away from user interactions and without compromising the quality of previously edited regions, leading to better patient outcomes.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes