Actively Discovering New Slots for Task-oriented Conversation
This addresses the challenge of adapting conversational AI to emerging user needs in real-world applications, though it is incremental by building on existing active learning and information extraction methods.
The paper tackles the problem of discovering new slots in task-oriented conversation systems without relying on pre-defined ontologies, proposing an active learning framework that incorporates uncertainty and diversity sampling to efficiently use human labeling, achieving improved performance over competitive baselines on public datasets.
Existing task-oriented conversational search systems heavily rely on domain ontologies with pre-defined slots and candidate value sets. In practical applications, these prerequisites are hard to meet, due to the emerging new user requirements and ever-changing scenarios. To mitigate these issues for better interaction performance, there are efforts working towards detecting out-of-vocabulary values or discovering new slots under unsupervised or semi-supervised learning paradigm. However, overemphasizing on the conversation data patterns alone induces these methods to yield noisy and arbitrary slot results. To facilitate the pragmatic utility, real-world systems tend to provide a stringent amount of human labelling quota, which offers an authoritative way to obtain accurate and meaningful slot assignments. Nonetheless, it also brings forward the high requirement of utilizing such quota efficiently. Hence, we formulate a general new slot discovery task in an information extraction fashion and incorporate it into an active learning framework to realize human-in-the-loop learning. Specifically, we leverage existing language tools to extract value candidates where the corresponding labels are further leveraged as weak supervision signals. Based on these, we propose a bi-criteria selection scheme which incorporates two major strategies, namely, uncertainty-based sampling and diversity-based sampling to efficiently identify terms of interest. We conduct extensive experiments on several public datasets and compare with a bunch of competitive baselines to demonstrate the effectiveness of our method. We have made the code and data used in this paper publicly available.