CLAILGMay 24, 2023

PromptNER: Prompting For Named Entity Recognition

arXiv:2305.15444v268 citations
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

It addresses the challenge of adapting NER to new tasks with limited data, offering a practical solution for NLP applications, though it builds incrementally on existing prompt-based methods.

The paper tackles the problem of few-shot and cross-domain Named Entity Recognition (NER) by introducing PromptNER, which uses Large Language Models (LLMs) with prompts and entity definitions to generate entities and explanations, achieving state-of-the-art performance with improvements such as a 4% F1 gain on ConLL and 9% on GENIA.

In a surprising turn, Large Language Models (LLMs) together with a growing arsenal of prompt-based heuristics now offer powerful off-the-shelf approaches providing few-shot solutions to myriad classic NLP problems. However, despite promising early results, these LLM-based few-shot methods remain far from the state of the art in Named Entity Recognition (NER), where prevailing methods include learning representations via end-to-end structural understanding and fine-tuning on standard labeled corpora. In this paper, we introduce PromptNER, a new state-of-the-art algorithm for few-Shot and cross-domain NER. To adapt to any new NER task PromptNER requires a set of entity definitions in addition to the standard few-shot examples. Given a sentence, PromptNER prompts an LLM to produce a list of potential entities along with corresponding explanations justifying their compatibility with the provided entity type definitions. Remarkably, PromptNER achieves state-of-the-art performance on few-shot NER, achieving a 4% (absolute) improvement in F1 score on the ConLL dataset, a 9% (absolute) improvement on the GENIA dataset, and a 4% (absolute) improvement on the FewNERD dataset. PromptNER also moves the state of the art on Cross Domain NER, outperforming prior methods (including those not limited to the few-shot setting), setting a new mark on 3/5 CrossNER target domains, with an average F1 gain of 3%, despite using less than 2% of the available data.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes