DSJul 15

Sliding suffix trees revisited

arXiv:2307.014129.74 citationsh-index: 25
Predicted impact top 17% in DS · last 90 daysOriginality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

For researchers working on sliding window suffix trees, this provides a worst-case efficient update mechanism, though the improvement is incremental.

This paper presents the first algorithm that maintains edge labels in a sliding suffix tree in O(1) worst-case time per node deletion/insertion, improving over previous O(1) amortized-time algorithms.

The sliding suffix tree (Fiala \& Greene, 1989) is a suffix tree that is maintained for a sliding window $W_i = T[i..i+d-1]$ of size $d$ that shifts over an input text $T$ of length $n$ from left to right, for increasing $i = 1, \ldots, n-d+1$. It is known that the sliding suffix tree can be maintained in $O(n \log σ)$ time with $O(d)$ space, where $σ$ is the alphabet size. Updating the sliding suffix tree from $W_i = T[i..i+d-1]$ to $W_{i+1} = T[i+1..i+d]$ requires the following three major tasks: (1) Delete the leaf that represents the longest suffix $W_i$, (2) Insert new leaves that represent the suffixes of $W_{i+1}$ that appear exactly once in $W_{i+1}$, and (3) After the leaf deletion due to Task (1) and each leaf insertion due to Task (2), maintain the label $\langle \ell, r \rangle$ of every edge as a valid pair in the new window $W_{i+1}$, such that $i+1 \leq \ell \leq r \leq i+d$. In this paper, we present the first algorithm that performs Task (3) in $O(1)$ worst-case time per node deletion/insertion, which leads to another alternative to efficient sliding suffix tree construction. This is an improvement over the existing algorithms by Larsson (1996, 1999) and by Senft (2005) both of which can only perform Task (3) in $O(1)$ amortized time. Our key data structure is a non-trivial extension of leaf pointers, which were originally proposed by Brodnik and Jekovec (2018) for pattern matching with sliding suffix trees.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes