COMP-PHSRLGJul 14, 2023

Solving higher-order Lane-Emden-Fowler type equations using physics-informed neural networks: benchmark tests comparing soft and hard constraints

arXiv:2307.07302v12 citationsh-index: 14
Originality Synthesis-oriented
AI Analysis

This work addresses numerical solution challenges for singular ODEs in physics and engineering, presenting an incremental improvement by comparing PINN variants.

The paper tackled solving higher-order singular ordinary differential equations like Lane-Emden-Fowler types using Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs), comparing soft and hard constraint variants, and reported successful application across second to fourth-order equations with specific numerical results implied but not detailed.

In this paper, numerical methods using Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) are presented with the aim to solve higher-order ordinary differential equations (ODEs). Indeed, this deep-learning technique is successfully applied for solving different classes of singular ODEs, namely the well known second-order Lane-Emden equations, third order-order Emden-Fowler equations, and fourth-order Lane-Emden-Fowler equations. Two variants of PINNs technique are considered and compared. First, a minimization procedure is used to constrain the total loss function of the neural network, in which the equation residual is considered with some weight to form a physics-based loss and added to the training data loss that contains the initial/boundary conditions. Second, a specific choice of trial solutions ensuring these conditions as hard constraints is done in order to satisfy the differential equation, contrary to the first variant based on training data where the constraints appear as soft ones. Advantages and drawbacks of PINNs variants are highlighted.

Code Implementations1 repo
Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes