ITLGSPMLSep 16, 2023

Solving Quadratic Systems with Full-Rank Matrices Using Sparse or Generative Priors

arXiv:2309.09032v27 citationsh-index: 8
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This work addresses signal recovery challenges in applications like unassigned distance geometry and sub-wavelength imaging, offering improved methods but is incremental as it builds on existing priors and algorithms.

This paper tackles the problem of recovering a signal from a quadratic system with full-rank matrices in high-dimensional settings where measurements are limited, by incorporating sparse or generative priors. It introduces algorithms like thresholded Wirtinger flow for sparse signals, achieving linear convergence with O(k log n) measurements, and projected gradient descent for generative priors, enabling precise image recovery on MNIST with small measurement counts.

The problem of recovering a signal $\boldsymbol x\in \mathbb{R}^n$ from a quadratic system $\{y_i=\boldsymbol x^\top\boldsymbol A_i\boldsymbol x,\ i=1,\ldots,m\}$ with full-rank matrices $\boldsymbol A_i$ frequently arises in applications such as unassigned distance geometry and sub-wavelength imaging. With i.i.d. standard Gaussian matrices $\boldsymbol A_i$, this paper addresses the high-dimensional case where $m\ll n$ by incorporating prior knowledge of $\boldsymbol x$. First, we consider a $k$-sparse $\boldsymbol x$ and introduce the thresholded Wirtinger flow (TWF) algorithm that does not require the sparsity level $k$. TWF comprises two steps: the spectral initialization that identifies a point sufficiently close to $\boldsymbol x$ (up to a sign flip) when $m=O(k^2\log n)$, and the thresholded gradient descent which, when provided a good initialization, produces a sequence linearly converging to $\boldsymbol x$ with $m=O(k\log n)$ measurements. Second, we explore the generative prior, assuming that $x$ lies in the range of an $L$-Lipschitz continuous generative model with $k$-dimensional inputs in an $\ell_2$-ball of radius $r$. With an estimate correlated with the signal, we develop the projected gradient descent (PGD) algorithm that also comprises two steps: the projected power method that provides an initial vector with $O\big(\sqrt{\frac{k \log L}{m}}\big)$ $\ell_2$-error given $m=O(k\log(Lnr))$ measurements, and the projected gradient descent that refines the $\ell_2$-error to $O(δ)$ at a geometric rate when $m=O(k\log\frac{Lrn}{δ^2})$. Experimental results corroborate our theoretical findings and show that: (i) our approach for the sparse case notably outperforms the existing provable algorithm sparse power factorization; (ii) leveraging the generative prior allows for precise image recovery in the MNIST dataset from a small number of quadratic measurements.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes