Nested Control Co-design of a Spar Buoy Horizontal-axis Floating Offshore Wind Turbine
For floating offshore wind turbine designers, this work demonstrates that CCD can yield significant performance gains over sequential design, though it uses a simplified model.
This paper presents a nested control co-design (CCD) approach for a spar buoy floating offshore wind turbine, optimizing plant and control simultaneously. The CCD result improves annual energy production (AEP) by over 11% compared to the baseline design.
Floating offshore wind turbine (FOWT) systems involve several coupled physical analysis disciplines, including aeroelasticity, multi-body structural dynamics, hydrodynamics, and controls. Conventionally, physical structure (plant) and control design decisions are treated as two separate problems, and generally, control design is performed after the plant design is complete. However, this sequential design approach cannot fully capitalize upon the synergy between plant and control design decisions. These conventional design practices produce suboptimal designs, especially in cases with strong coupling between plant and control design decisions. Control co-design (CCD) is a holistic design approach that accounts fully for plant-control design coupling by optimizing these decisions simultaneously. CCD is especially advantageous for system design problems with complex interactions between physics disciplines, which is the case for FOWT systems. This paper presents and demonstrates a nested CCD approach using open-loop optimal control (OLOC) for a simplified reduced-order model that simulates FOWT dynamic behavior. This simplified model is helpful for optimization studies due to its computational efficiency, but is still sufficiently rich enough to capture important multidisciplinary physics couplings and plant-control design coupling associated with a horizontal-axis FOWT system with a spar buoy floating platform. The CCD result shows an improvement in the objective function, annual energy production (AEP), compared to the baseline design by more than eleven percent. Optimization studies at this fidelity level can provide system design engineers with insights into design directions that leverage design coupling to improve performance. These studies also provide a template for future more detailed turbine CCD optimization studies that utilize higher fidelity models and design representations.